跳至主要内容

In the past two days, another big secret of the US has been exposed.


 Today's going to be a short piece.

First, look at this news: After making a lot of noise and sending two aircraft carriers to bomb the Houthi forces for a long time, the last US carrier in the Red Sea announced yesterday that it's withdrawing and heading back home.
What does this event signify? The US has suffered another defeat: In just a short span of over a month, a bunch of its "Reaper drones," valued at around $100 million each in the international market, were shot down by the Houthis. Additionally, two F-18 carrier-based aircraft plummeted into the sea, turning from planes into submarines in an instant. However, these incidents aren't surprising as they were somewhat anticipated. But there's one thing that has been quite puzzling: A while back, the US and the Houthi forces, these two major military powers, abruptly announced a ceasefire agreement, leaving the entire world, including Israel, baffled and wondering what had transpired. Recently, some US media outlets have published articles finally revealing the inside story. It's claimed that after the Houthi forces nearly shot down an F-35 stealth fighter, the US was thrown into a panic, realizing that continuing the conflict would lead to no good outcome, and thus hastily agreed to a ceasefire. How should we interpret this? For a long time, Western public opinion has been hyping up the weapons of the US and other Western countries while belittling those of China and Russia. The primary rhetoric the West employs regarding our weapons is the lack of combat experience. Not long ago, when Pakistan used the J-10C to shoot down an Indian Rafale fighter jet, it caused a global sensation. However, the French shifted the blame, claiming that their planes are excellent and the issue was with the Indian pilots not utilizing them effectively. But in the case of the F-35 stealth fighter nearly being taken down by the Houthis, the Americans can't dodge responsibility. After all, the aircraft was piloted by a US aviator, and it escaped through maneuvering and jamming by sheer luck.
To put it bluntly, if the Houthi missiles were a bit more accurate and the PL-15 had targeted it, the F-35 would likely have been history.

If the F-35 had truly been shot down by the Houthi forces, how could the Americans continue selling hundreds of billions of dollars' worth of arms? Having realized the immense danger, the US felt compelled to reconcile with the Houthi forces, this so-called world military power. How should we interpret this? No wonder during our negotiations with the US in Geneva, the Americans disregarded their usual arrogance, put aside their "Dayerman Yingxue," and agreed to numerous terms. Nowadays, the US can't even subdue the Houthi forces. After this exposure, we'll have to reassess its military capabilities. If the US doesn't possess the military strength it once boasted of and desperately tries to convince other nations of, yet still aims to have a massive share of the pie, its future seems rather bleak. But can the US cover this up all by itself? Probably not. Because in the coming period, numerous countries will find various pretexts and reasons to openly or covertly test the true military strength of the US. We don't even need to take action! As the saying goes: A god cannot bleed. Once a god bleeds, the faith will collapse, and then a multitude of god-slayers will emerge. The US is likely going to be busy dealing with various challenges ahead!

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...