跳至主要内容

Insights into the Liaoning Carrier from Benz's Report (Part Two)


 On the 27th, Benz's Joint Staff released a new report. Let's delve into the details within the report.

Sortie Rate


Over the two days of the 25th and 26th, a total of 120 sorties were conducted, averaging 60 per day. For comparison, during last year's United Sword B exercise, the Liaoning Carrier achieved its highest sortie rate, as detailed in "From Benz's Report to the Leap of the Carrierborne Aviation."

It hasn't yet reached the peak. However, based on previous calculations in "Some Thoughts on Carrierborne Aircraft Sortie Rate," there is a possibility of surpassing the record of 70 sorties per day. This would exceed: 1) the 50-60 sorties per day during the 2015 Charles de Gaulle Carrier's strike against ISIS; and 2) the 66 sorties per day during the Nimitz Carrier's display of force in the South China Sea from March 1 to 4, 2016. These are both flat-top catapult carriers. While the maximum sortie rate may still lag behind, the daily combat sortie rate is already quite impressive.

Sortie Batches

According to Benz's Joint Staff report:
In December 2022, as the Liaoning Carrier moved from the Miyako Strait to the waters near the Okinotorishima Island, the daily average sortie batches were 7.5 batches per day. This was while operating around the Okinawa base group, facing intense reconnaissance by the US and Japan. Later, as the Liaoning Carrier moved south toward Guam, the daily average sortie batches dropped to 5 batches per day.
In April 2023, during the Shandong Carrier's first venture into the Western Pacific, the daily sortie batches reached 7.25 batches per day. In September, during its second Western Pacific deployment, including land-based aircraft, the figure peaked at 9 batches per day. In November, during its third Western Pacific deployment, the Shandong Carrier achieved a then-record of 8.3 batches per day with its own carrierborne aircraft.
In July 2024, during the Shandong Carrier's Western Pacific deployment, the daily sortie batches reached 10 batches per day.
In October 2024, during United Sword B, the Liaoning Carrier achieved a daily average of 12.5 sortie batches per day.
It is evident that over the span of two years, there has been a very significant increase in our daily sortie batches, with the growth rate showing an upward trend.
In contrast, this time the estimated daily average is around 7.5 batches, similar to the Liaoning Carrier's sortie batches near Okinotorishima Island in 2022. Later, when the Shandong Carrier first ventured into the Western Pacific, the sortie batches were also comparable. It appears that the frequency of intense reconnaissance and harassment around the Okinawa base group by the US and Japan is roughly around 7-8 batches per day.
However, in terms of sorties per batch, there has been a noticeable increase this time. It is speculated that there are two possible reasons: one is to engage in aerial refueling to counter long-range reconnaissance aircraft like the P-3C; and the other is to counter the Japanese Air Self-Defense Force's F-15Js from Naha and the US Air Force's fighters from Kadena (though not mentioned in Benz's report, they must have been active), thus increasing the number of sorties.

The Photography Issue Again

The newly emerged Nanchang warship is still photographed from the水面舰艇 (surface warship) perspective.

However, the Wuxi and Qiqihar warships, which crossed the Miyako Strait ahead of the Liaoning Carrier, have clear aerial photos.

This also reveals part of the issue.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...
发表评论
阅读全文

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...
发表评论
阅读全文

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...
发表评论
阅读全文