跳至主要内容

Recently, South Korea's used car exports have been surging, creating new opportunities in the market.

 


According to the Korea International Trade Association, last month South Korea's used car exports reached $761.4 million (approximately 1 trillion KRW), a year-on-year increase of 94.8%, setting a new historical monthly record.

In the used car export park near the Old Songdo Amusement Park in Incheon's Yeonsu District, half of the country's 4,854 used car export companies are located. This park alone houses nearly 20,000 used cars, with transport trailers continuously transporting these vehicles to the port for overseas shipment.
Despite the growing trend of new energy vehicles, why is there still such a large export market for South Korean used cars? South Korean industry insiders attribute this mainly to US sanctions. Buyers from Central Asian countries like Turkey and Kyrgyzstan act as "middlemen," reselling South Korean used cars to Russia. Due to financial constraints, Russians have a high demand for vehicles that are almost new. However, this situation is temporary and is purely due to South Korea's channel advantages in vehicle sales. Even these so-called "near-new used cars" are not cheap in Russia. For example, 2021-2022 models of accident-free SUVs can reach prices of $30,000 to $40,000. This is almost on par with the prices of our full new energy vehicles.
In addition to Russia, this year South Korean used car sales in the Middle East have also increased significantly. Notably, in Syria, following the fall of the Assad regime, used car sales have surged from 144 vehicles throughout last year to 3,084 vehicles last month. Sales in the UAE and Jordan also rose by 263% and 127% respectively last month.

What do these figures reveal? If one only sees the popularity of South Korean used cars, they would be making a big mistake. South Korean used cars, with their plastic-smelling, cheap Plus dull interiors, cannot compare to our domestically produced new energy vehicles, many of which feature advanced technologies. If the two were to compete head-to-head, South Korean cars, whether used or new, would be easily outperformed.
So why are South Korean used cars still selling so well? The reason is simple: their channel development is far superior to ours. In many countries, users do not even have the chance to compare. Therefore, the real takeaway from this news is the vast future market for our new energy vehicles. It is reasonable to believe that once our channels are fully established, this phenomenon will disappear. This also illustrates a truth: there are plenty of opportunities in this world; what is lacking is the ability to discover them.
Looking at these figures, it's clear that there's more to the story than meets the eye. While South Korean used cars may seem popular, it's a mistake to take this at face value. The truth is, when compared to our domestically produced new energy vehicles, which boast cutting-edge technology and superior quality, South Korean used cars simply can't compete. In a direct comparison, South Korean cars, whether new or used, would be easily outmatched.
So, why are South Korean used cars still selling so well? The answer lies in one factor: their superior channel development. In many countries, consumers don't even have the chance to compare. This news actually highlights the vast potential market for our new energy vehicles. It's reasonable to believe that once we establish a comprehensive channel network, this phenomenon will disappear. This also serves as a reminder that opportunities abound in this world; what's often missing is the ability to recognize and seize them.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...