跳至主要内容

A Fire in the Backyard: How Trump Lit a Diplomatic Bonfire with Brazil


For decades Washington treated Latin America as its private yard. This week the yard caught fire—and the flames are coming from the region’s largest country.

In a matter of days, the United States and Brazil have lurched from the usual hemispheric bickering to open hostility. The spark? One tweet and a letter from Donald Trump. The fallout? Brazil’s president is now flirting with ditching the dollar, and crowds in São Paulo and Rio are burning U.S. flags.
The two sentences that shook the hemisphere
On Wednesday, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva—normally careful not to provoke Washington—dropped the diplomatic equivalent of a match on dry tinder.
First: “Brazil has no obligation to keep using the dollar in its trade.”
Translation: we can walk away from the greenback if pushed.
Second: “We can live without trade with the United States; we have other partners.”
Translation: don’t assume we need you more than you need us.
Coming from the leader of Latin America’s economic heavyweight, the remarks were unprecedented.
From courtroom drama to tariff war

Behind Lula’s anger is a domestic Brazilian story that spiraled into a bilateral crisis.
  1. The coup that never was
    After losing the 2022 election, former president Jair Bolsonaro—often called the “Trump of the Tropics”—refused to concede. Prosecutors now say he and a handful of loyal officers plotted a January-style insurrection, complete with fake election-fraud claims and feelers to sympathetic generals.
    The scheme fizzled; Bolsonaro had retired as a mere captain, and old comrades weren’t willing to risk their careers. Brazilian police uncovered the evidence, and on 10 June Bolsonaro went on trial for attempted coup, criminal conspiracy, and damage to democratic institutions.
  2. Trump rides to Bolsonaro’s defense
    Donald Trump, who shares both Bolsonaro’s politics and his evangelical base, erupted. First he threatened new tariffs on the entire BRICS bloc—this year’s summit is being hosted by Brazil—calling the group “anti-American.” Two days later he announced a 50 % tariff on Brazilian goods, justifying it as punishment for Lula’s “political persecution” of Bolsonaro.
  3. Brazil hits back
    The reaction in Brasília was swift and furious.
    • The foreign ministry summoned the U.S. chargé d’affaires and handed the protest letter back unread.

    • Agriculture Minister Carlos Fávaro shrugged off the tariffs: Brazilian soy, beef, and iron ore can pivot from U.S. buyers to China, the Middle East, and South Asia.
    • Anti-Trump demonstrations erupted in major cities. Even some Bolsonaro supporters balked at siding with a foreign bully against their own courts.
Why Washington should worry
Brazil is no minor player. It is the Western Hemisphere’s second-largest country by population (215 million) and landmass (8.5 million km²). If Brasília decides to deepen ties with Beijing—or any outside power—the U.S. loses strategic depth in its own neighborhood.
Republican hawks who normally cheer Trump’s every tariff are privately uneasy. Hemispheric solidarity has always been America’s fallback; torching it over a defeated ally looks less like strength and more like self-sabotage.

The absurdity of the moment
Barely a month ago, the Trump White House announced “only” a 10 % tariff on Brazil. Now, without new negotiations, the number quintupled—justified by a domestic Brazilian court case. Last year Brazil actually ran a $7.4 billion trade deficit with the United States. By Trump’s own logic, Washington, not Brasília, is the “winner.”
Yet here we are. One tweet, one letter, and the backyard is ablaze—fueled by a former U.S. president and the wounded pride of a former Brazilian one.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...