跳至主要内容

Three Years Later, America’s Financial Blitzkrieg Ends in Humiliation

Frankfurt Stock Exchange
Three years ago, President Biden used the Ukraine war to launch a financial shock-and-awe campaign—aimed squarely at Europe. The verdict is now in: the United States didn’t just lose; it suffered a catastrophic rout.
The smoking gun?
• European equity funds have taken in over $100 billion this year—three times last year’s pace.
• U.S. outflows have more than doubled, hitting $87 billion.
• Germany alone saw U.S. capital inflows surge 116% in the first four months of 2025, to €46 billion—the highest since 2022.
Why 2022? Because that’s when Washington’s financial war machine went into overdrive.
To this day, many people in the United States still praise Reagan, but they have no idea that the deindustrialization of the United States, which has reached this point, actually began under Reagan!
The rot runs deep.
America’s economic decline didn’t start with Biden or Trump. It began in the 1980s, when Ronald Reagan’s de-industrialization gamble hollowed out the nation’s productive core. The Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991 created a dangerous illusion: that Reagan’s path was not merely survivable but the definitive model for “the end of history.”
Back then, when the US government handed out free money to Wall Street, it sparked widespread public discontent. In fact, there should have been vigilance at that time, but the dissatisfaction was suppressed and proved ineffective.

Hubris followed.
• 2008: Wall Street’s financial engineering detonated the global crisis.
• 2009–2020: Instead of tightening, Washington doubled down—first with Obama’s quantitative easing, then Trump’s helicopter money during COVID, and finally Biden’s refusal to unwind the stimulus.
• 2021: The euro’s share of global payments (37.92%) nearly matched the dollar’s (40.64%), threatening the greenback’s hegemony.
The Ukraine gambit.
By early 2022, the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department knew the game was up. Inflation was no longer “transitory,” and the U.S. could not afford a slow, measured tightening cycle. The solution?
  1. Shock therapy: Aggressive 75-basis-point hikes—unprecedented in four decades.
  2. War premium: Stoke conflict in Europe to force capital flight into dollar-denominated assets.
The plan worked—at first. Roughly $1–1.5 trillion in European capital fled to the U.S., and energy volatility pushed additional European firms across the Atlantic. Biden’s team celebrated a double victory: financial inflows plus industrial relocation.

Then came the plot twist.
Trump’s return in 2024 shattered the calculus. His erratic tariff policies and capricious regulatory shifts made U.S. markets feel unsafe. Capital began reversing course—despite U.S. interest rates still exceeding Europe’s. German firms, for example, recorded three straight months of withdrawals from the U.S. in early 2025, culminating in a €2.38 billion net outflow in April.
Verdict: a self-inflicted rout.
Biden’s carefully laid trap unraveled not through grand strategy but through the sheer unpredictability of his successor. The U.S. financial war machine, designed to bleed Europe, ended up hemorrhaging itself.
Three takeaways for Washington:
  1. Hubris is expensive. The Reagan-era myth of American exceptionalism blinded policymakers to structural rot.
  2. Self-repair is a myth. A system that could not fix itself after 2008 was never going to survive another decade of denial.
  3. Blowback is coming. The failed financial offensive has left the U.S. weaker, more indebted, and vulnerable to the very crisis it sought to export.
The tragedy? Tens of thousands died in Ukraine for a gambit that, in the end, collapsed under its own contradictions.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...

Trump's Middle East Deal: A Grand Spectacle for the Eyes

  These days, as Trump journeys through the Middle East, online hype has reached a fever pitch: “The Americans are truly formidable! Trump’s mere presence has the Gulf states groveling, offering up piles of cash as tribute!” But is this portrayal accurate? At first glance, it seems plausible. The figures speak for themselves: Saudi Arabia has pledged a staggering $600 billion investment in the U.S., alongside a near $142 billion arms deal—the largest in history. The UAE has committed over $200 billion in cooperation spanning aviation, aluminum, and oil and gas sectors. Qatar has signed multiple agreements worth over $243.5 billion, including purchases of Boeing passenger jets and armed drones. Combined, these commitments exceed $1 trillion. Yet, the grandstanding doesn’t stop there. Rumors suggest Trump has urged Saudi Arabia to increase its investment from $600 billion to a full $1 trillion. Some American media outlets are now clamoring that total investments from both governments...