跳至主要内容

China Just Quietly Commissioned Its Fourth Type-075 Assault Ship—Why Build More When the Brand-New Type-076 Is Already Around?


With almost no fanfare, the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has welcomed its fourth Type-075 amphibious assault ship, Hubei, into the South Sea Fleet. The announcement, slipped into a routine PLA Day story on the fleet’s WeChat account, ended months of speculation.

Yet the arrival drew shrugs instead of headlines: last December’s launch of the far more advanced Type-076 “Sichuan”—the world’s first catapult-equipped “drone-carrying assault carrier”—had already stolen the spotlight.



So why is China still churning out 075s? The short answer: the PLAN needs hulls now, not tomorrow, and the two ships do different jobs.
The inheritance of equipment

1. A Case of Too Much Success, Too Fast

When the Type-075 program began in the mid-2010s, planners expected a long gap before next-gen tech—integrated electric drive, advanced radars, and especially electromagnetic catapults—was mature. Instead, every subsystem beat its deadline.

By 2023 the first Type-076 could be ordered before the last 075 contract had even finished cutting steel.
Canceling the final 075 hulls would have meant scrapping already-purchased engines, steel, and dockyard slots—an expensive lesson in how Chinese R&D sometimes outruns its own procurement cycle.

The actual application of the troops

2. The Fleet Needs Proven Workhorses

The Type-075 is a known quantity. Its propulsion is a conservative diesel-gas mix, its sensors are lifted straight from the ubiquitous Type-054A frigate, and its flight deck is “helicopter-only” simple. Crews can master it in months, not years.
The Type-076, by contrast, is a leap into carrier-grade complexity: twin islands, electromagnetic catapults, and a powerplant that is half gas-turbine, half integrated full-electric. PLAN aviators have only just begun to qualify on electromagnetic launch with Fujian (the country’s newest carrier).

Asking them to do the same on an assault ship—while also learning to operate large fixed-wing drones—would push training pipelines past their breaking point.
In short, the 075 delivers brigade-level lift today; the 076 promises carrier-lite air wings someday.

The difference in undertaking tasks

3. Different Ships, Different Missions

Think of the two types as occupying overlapping but distinct rungs on a ladder of escalation.
  • Type-075
    • Core task: move 900 marines, armor, and 30 helicopters to a beach.
    • Secondary roles: disaster relief, non-combatant evacuation, “show the flag” cruises.
    • Works best in littoral waters with air cover from shore-based fighters.
  • Type-076
    • Adds a 100-meter electromagnetic catapult and a much larger hangar.
    • Can launch fixed-wing UCAVs (and, in a pinch, J-35 fighters) for deep interdiction or outer air-battle screens.
    • Designed to operate behind a carrier, acting as a drone arsenal and sensor node.
The PLAN’s problem set—possible Taiwan contingencies, South China Sea island seizures, and far-sea escort missions—requires both niche ships. One is a truck, the other a Swiss-army knife. You don’t mothball the trucks just because the knives got sharper.

The theory of rapid construction of 076?

4. Speed of Construction Still Matters

Despite rumors that the 076 could be mass-produced like WWII Essex carriers, reality is messier. After launch, Sichuan still needs months in the water for hull stress relaxation before technicians can bolt in its catapults—exactly the same bottleneck that slowed Fujian.

Yard sources say the 076’s fitting-out phase will be closer to a carrier’s timeline than to the 075’s brisk 12-month sprint from launch to commissioning.
Meanwhile, Hubei moved from floating dock to fleet service in under a year, a pace the PLAN still needs if it wants to keep up with a growing Marine Corps and expanding overseas base network.

Bottom Line


For the moment, the Type-075 remains the PLAN’s most reliable way to put troops ashore in a hurry. The Type-076 is the future, but the future is not yet fully debugged. Until it is, the “obsolete” 075 is anything but—more like a dependable sedan parked next to an electric super-car still waiting for its software update.
In Chinese naval service, Hubei is not yesterday’s news; it is the workhorse of today’s contingency plans.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...
发表评论
阅读全文

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...
发表评论
阅读全文

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...
发表评论
阅读全文