跳至主要内容

Europe Just Got Played—Big Time


The West woke up yesterday to a sucker-punch that makes Tokyo’s recent tariff fiasco look like a parking ticket. Two weeks ago Washington told Japan it would “only” slap on an extra 15 % duty—then quietly clarified that the 15 % would be stacked on top of existing rates. Tokyo is still fuming. But compared with what just hit Europe and Ukraine, Japan got off easy—at least ten times easier.

Act I: The Bait
For months Donald Trump had played footsie with Vladimir Putin. Then, overnight, he spun 180 degrees. “Putin is spilling innocent blood—my own wife is horrified!” he thundered. The White House rolled out a sanctions bazooka: 100 % tariffs on all Russian goods and a blanket 100 % levy on anyone, anywhere, buying Russian oil.
The clock started ticking: 50 days to cease-fire. Then 12. Then nine.
European capitals and Kyiv exhaled in relief. Finally, the cavalry. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte—fresh from a viral “did-he-or-didn’t-he” call Trump “Daddy” moment—decided he indeed had. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen flew to Scotland and swallowed a lopsided trade deal: Europe would swallow a new 15 % U.S. tariff, buy an extra $750 billion in American energy, and funnel $600 billion of investment stateside—all while keeping the existing 25 % steel-and-aluminum duties and promising not to retaliate.
Macron, Scholz, and half a dozen premiers howled betrayal. Von der Leyen shrugged: “Best deal available. Trump is cornering Putin—let’s keep him happy.” The continent bit its tongue. Lives first, money later.
Act II: The Switch
Enter Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff. On August 6 he spent three unscripted hours in the Kremlin. The official read-out? “Useful and constructive.” Translation: zilch.
Europe and Kyiv still clung to hope—until Trump himself announced he would meet Putin on August 15 … in Anchorage, Alaska. Then came the kicker: the rumored “land swap.” Russia keeps what it has seized; Ukraine evacuates the 30 % of Donetsk still under its control, including the besieged fortress of Chasiv Yar. The front line becomes the new border—signed and sealed without a single European or Ukrainian at the table.
Act III: The Panic
Kyiv went into overdrive. President Zelensky dialed every EU leader in his contacts list, pleading for a united front. Brussels, suddenly aware it had traded its wallet for a mirage, drafted an emergency joint letter. The signatories—Macron, Scholz, Meloni, Starmer, Tusk, Stubb, and a sheepish von der Leyen—beg Washington to “safeguard the vital interests of Ukraine and Europe.”
Translation: “We know we’ve been conned; please stop carving up the map without us.”
The Takeaway
In less than three weeks, the White House ran the oldest con in the book—bait and switch—at continental scale. Europe handed over markets, money, and dignity for the promise of American steel against Moscow, only to watch the same American leader wink at Putin and hand him the pen.


And the tariffs, investments, and energy purchases? They’re still inked, still binding, and—because they were never formally linked to the Russia policy—legally bulletproof.
Allies or appetizers? Last night Brussels finally realized it was on the menu.

评论

发表评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...
发表评论
阅读全文

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...
发表评论
阅读全文

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...
发表评论
阅读全文