跳至主要内容

Trump Just Pulled His Most Venomous Move Yet


Late Thursday night Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, marched a second criminal referral to the Justice Department—this one aimed squarely at Fed governor Lisa Cook. Donald Trump, not coincidentally, is now trying to fire her.

The official charge? On government ethics forms Cook allegedly low-balled the value of three properties and—here comes the hook—secured a mortgage under what the White House is calling “fraudulent terms.”
A paperwork squabble over a house? Hardly. Trump has discovered that the fastest path to the Fed’s printing press runs straight through America’s front doors and backyards.
The backstory is simple: once Trump 2.0 took shape, the president-elect’s inner circle concluded that the single most lucrative lever in the United States is still the power to create dollars. That lever, however, sits inside the Federal Reserve—an institution arm-in-arm with Wall Street. A frontal assault would ignite a market meltdown. So Trump is waging a proxy war, and he has chosen the one issue every voter with a mailbox full of mortgage coupons understands: the roof over his head.

First he tried Chairman Powell. The gambit was “Look how lavishly the Fed is renovating its own headquarters!” But marble lobbies in a public building are a tough sell to suburban swing voters. The attack stalled.
Then came Governor Cook’s real-estate filings—private residences, personal mortgages, the stuff of kitchen-table outrage. Suddenly the Fed’s refusal to slash rates is no longer an abstract policy debate; it is being framed as a conspiracy to keep Main Street’s monthly payment sky-high while insiders cut themselves sweetheart deals.
Why housing? Trace the timeline:
  • February 2022: Russia invades Ukraine.
  • March 2022: Powell and then-Treasury Secretary Yellen—who had spent months insisting inflation was “transitory”—pivot overnight. Rates rocket from near-zero to 5.25–5.5 %, the steepest ascent since the early 2000s.
The federal-funds rate is only the baseline. By the time a 30-year mortgage reaches a borrower’s closing table, the sticker price is 6.6–7 %. Homeowners are furious, and Trump knows it.
So the messaging writes itself: “Powell and his board won’t cut rates—won’t even let me take the steering wheel—because they’re bleeding you dry. And while you’re sweating your mortgage, one of their own is gaming the system for a cheaper loan.”
Never mind that the alleged infraction is microscopic or that America’s financial regulations are a maze even JD-holders struggle to parse. In the era of TikTok explainers and cable-news chyrons, complexity is a feature, not a bug. The louder the allegation, the softer the rebuttal lands.
Bottom line: this is not about a governor’s disclosure form. It is about who controls America’s currency spigot. Trump, blocked from a direct takeover of the Fed, is waging law-fare by anecdote—weaponizing America’s housing angst to pry open the monetary fortress. After all, if you want to make money fast, nothing beats owning the printing press.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...