跳至主要内容

Trump’s New Cash Grab: If You Want to Visit America, Bring a Suitcase—of Money


Washington has just rolled out a pilot program that sounds more like a ransom demand than immigration policy. Beginning immediately, the State Department will demand cash deposits of up to $15,000 from would-be tourists and business travelers who come from countries with high visa-overstay rates. Miss your flight home by a single day and the money is forfeited—no hearings, no appeals.

This is the second time in less than a month that the administration has dipped into travelers’ pockets. On July 22, the White House quietly tacked a $250 “visa integrity surcharge” onto every non-immigrant application—students, tourists, conference-goers, everyone. The new fee is already written into the budget and cannot be waived for low-income applicants.
Do the math: a family of four from Shanghai could now pay $1,000 in surcharges before they even reach the counter that asks for a $5,000–$15,000 security deposit. That’s two layers of skin off the same traveler, and there’s still no guarantee you’ll be allowed past passport control.
Because once you land, another agency is waiting: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Officers have been grabbing people off the street with little more than a hunch. Last month in Alabama, a construction worker—a U.S. citizen—was body-slammed so hard he coughed blood. He screamed his citizenship; ICE slammed him into a van anyway. Hours later his family arrived with a birth certificate and got him released. No apology, no compensation, only a warning that he had “interfered with an official act.”
In Florida, an 18-year-old high-school senior named Kenny Leones—also a citizen—was Tasered and cuffed because the friend walking beside him looked “suspicious.” Video later captured officers joking about whether they should “just shoot the kid and be done with it.”
Even the self-appointed vigilantes aren’t safe. At a Texas airport an Asian-American traveler tried to score patriotism points by helping ICE spot “illegals.” Officers thanked him by detaining him instead. The internet summed it up in one cruel meme: “When you lick the boot, don’t be shocked when it stomps on you.”
So why the sudden desperation for tourist cash?
Tariffs were supposed to refill the Treasury, but they’ve delivered only $27.7 billion—barely enough to cover the extra staff hired to collect them. Someone in the West Wing did a back-of-the-envelope calculation: 11 million people entered the U.S. on temporary visas last year. If each could be squeezed for a few hundred—or a few thousand—dollars, the deficit looks smaller by breakfast.
What the memo didn’t factor in is basic human behavior. Charge a Chinese engineer $15,000 just for the chance to attend a conference in San Diego, then treat her like a criminal once she lands, and next year she’ll send a Zoom link instead.
History offers a precedent: the longer an empire’s finances fray, the faster it pulls up the drawbridge. Trump may discover that the quickest way to shrink the trade deficit is to make sure no one shows up to trade in the first place.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...