跳至主要内容

Greenland Is Suddenly the Most Dangerous Island in the World How a real-estate craving in Washington turned into a five-nation show of force—and pushed NATO to the brink of a family feud.


  1. From Real-Estate Crush to Red Line
    Donald Trump never really ended his 2019 attempt to buy Greenland; he just put it on lay-away. This summer he started talking like a man ready to foreclose. On the trail he vowed—twice—to “get that island,” and when a conservative radio host asked if U.S. troops might be part of the deal, he answered, “Whatever it takes.” Cue global spit-take: was an American president actually floating war against Denmark?

  1. Why Greenland Is the Hottest Frozen Asset on Earth
    Sitting between North America and Russia, Greenland is the Arctic’s ultimate aircraft carrier: 836,000 square miles of ice with a view of every future shipping lane. Under the ice sheet lie at least 3.85 billion tons of rare-earth oxides—enough to keep every F-35, iPhone and wind turbine in the Western world humming for decades—plus untapped oil and gas that look a lot more attractive now that Moscow’s pipelines are sanctioned. Trump the developer sees a waterfront lot; the Pentagon sees a missile-defense gap; the Danes see their own California-sized province that is not for sale.

  1. Europe’s Counter-Offer: Tanks, Not Talk
    Copenhagen’s reply arrived in steel. From 14–18 September Denmark hosted “Arctic Light,” the largest military drill in Greenland’s history, with Germany, France, Sweden and Norway. Fighter jets screamed over Disko Bay, frigates hunted submarines, and Danish Leopard tanks rolled across tundra that has never seen a tread mark. The invitation list pointedly excluded the United States. Message: if you want to seize the island, you’ll have to shoot past five NATO navies first.

  1. Japan’s “Glacier Research” That Wasn’t
    In May Japan’s former foreign minister, Yoko Kamikawa, flew in on an ice-breaker “to study climate change.” Her travel group included a dozen officials from the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry—the same bureau that bankrolls Tokyo’s rare-earth stockpile. They left with soil samples, satellite maps and a quiet nod from Copenhagen. Call it reconnaissance with a smile.

  1. The EU–Japan Mineral Pact: A Supply Chain Without Uncle Sam
    On 16 September EU Commissioner Thierry Breton landed in Tokyo and signed the “Greenland Critical Materials Partnership” with Japan. The text promises joint financing of mines, refineries and a “U.S.-optional, China-free” supply chain for rare earths, lithium and cobalt. Translation: Washington can join later, but only as a minority partner. The deal kneecaps Trump’s fallback plan—if you can’t buy the island, at least lock up the mining rights—by turning those rights into a multilateral condo board.

  1. Why an Invasion Is Still Fantasy
    The Pentagon loves Thule Air Base (which it already leases), but it has no desire to own the rest of the iceberg. Greenland has no port deep enough for an amphibious brigade, its coastline is a seasonal maze of sea ice, and Congress would have to vote to appropriate money to seize territory belonging to a founding NATO ally that lost 43 soldiers in Afghanistan. Even in today’s transactional GOP, that whip count starts at zero. Trump’s threat, generals privately admit, is “amateur hour with aircraft carriers.”

  1. The Art of the Bluff Meets the Science of the Snub
    Trump’s real estate playbook is simple: threaten the outrageous, settle for the profitable. Europeans have skipped ahead to the end-game. By staging their own drill and signing away future mining rights, they have shrunk the bargaining table to a cocktail napkin. The subtext: call our bluff and the only thing left to negotiate is American embarrassment. In Brussels the joke is that Greenland is now NATO’s biggest “frozen asset”—too big to fail and too cold to occupy.

  1. What Happens Next
    Expect a winter of summitry. Denmark will quietly offer Washington expanded Thule access and a minority stake in a new rare-earth refinery—face-saving candy that costs Copenhagen nothing because Greenland’s home-rule government still controls subsurface rights. The EU and Japan will keep signing MOUs, promising Nuuk roads, ports and processing plants that may or may not break permafrost. Trump will claim he forced allies to “pay their fair share.” And the first shipload of Greenlandic rare-earth concentrate will sail not under the Stars-and-Stripes but under a Danish-Franco-Japanese joint-venture flag—proof that the fastest way to beat an American land-grab is to treat it like a condo flip: line up rival bidders, stage an open house, and let the original bidder decide whether to join the homeowners’ association or storm off in a tweet.
The stand-off will cool, not because anyone surrendered, but because ice enforces patience. In the high north the weather still matters more than Twitter, and winter is the ultimate arms-control treaty—locking harbors, grounding jets and giving diplomats six dark months to remember why allies don’t shoot at one another.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...