跳至主要内容

The Biggest Joke of the Century Just Fell Apart (And Washington is the only one still laughing)

 


The punch-line finally landed this week: the “$900 billion victory” that Donald Trump bragged about with Tokyo and Seoul has turned into the most expensive pratfall in modern diplomacy.

Let’s rewind. Two months ago the White House rolled out what it called “historic trade deals” with Japan and South Korea. The fine print was eye-watering:
  • Seoul pledged to plough US$350 billion into American projects.
  • Tokyo topped it with US$550 billion.
  • Total headline figure: nine-hundred-billion dollars—more than the GDP of Saudi Arabia.

But the contract language was straight out of a mob movie:
  • Any profit, America keeps 90 percent; the Asian partner gets 10 percent.
  • Washington—not the investors—picks the sectors.
  • The money had to arrive “up-front,” in cash, no strings attached.
In other words: you bring the wallet, we pick the restaurant, and by the way we’re keeping the leftovers.
South Korea’s national-security adviser, Cho Tae-yong, answered first. “We can’t,” he said bluntly. Seoul’s entire foreign-exchange chest is US$416 billion; handing over 85 percent of it would trigger a bank run.
Seoul’s workaround: create a Korean-managed fund that will lend money to Korean companies if they choose to build ships or chips in the U.S. No cash to Treasury, no guarantees, no apology.
Trump exploded on live television: “It will be CASH, paid in advance!”
Translation: this is a stick-up, not a venture-capital round.
Japan’s reply was more polite—and more devastating. Chief trade envoy Akazawa Ryosei admitted that only “1–2 percent” of the promised US$550 billion is real equity. The rest is loans, loan guarantees and insurance—all of which have to be repaid, with interest, in Tokyo. Net gift to Washington: about US$11 billion, not US$550 billion.
Then Japan’s politics imploded. Prime Minister Ishiba dissolved parliament, called an election, and watched the ruling coalition lose its majority. The new LDP president, Sanae Takaichi, is an ultra-nationalist who campaigned on the slogan: “The trade accord is humiliating; I won’t honor it.”
Her coalition partner, Komeito, has already walked out. No party can cobble together 233 seats in the 465-seat lower house, so Japan now has no functioning government to sign the check—even if it wanted to.
Result: the two allies that were supposed to bankroll Trump’s infrastructure renaissance have quietly pulled the fire alarm and fled the building.
Washington is left shouting into the void, demanding US$900 billion that never existed in the first place.
The episode is a master-class in geopolitical slap-stick:
  • Stage 1: America writes a ransom note and calls it a trade deal.
  • Stage 2: Tokyo and Seoul nod solemnly, promise the moon, then redefine “investment” as “loans we’ll recall later.”
  • Stage 3: Trump demands hard cash; Asian officials shrug, cite central-bank law, parliamentary gridlock and, if necessary, the weather.
  • Stage 4: The would-be robber discovers the vault is full of IOUs—written by himself.
As the Chinese classic Romance of the Three Kingdoms puts it:
The con-man met a sharper con-man.
Moral of the story: when you try to mug a banker, make sure he hasn’t already sold you his own wallet.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...