Israel’s “Target-Switching” Tactics: From Iran to Lebanon

Barely 72 hours after a fragile cease-fire with Iran, Israel’s air force unleashed 15 precision airstrikes on southern Lebanon on June 27, 2025, killing at least one civilian and wounding four others. The speed and ferocity of the assault—executed in under 20 minutes—underscored a grim pattern: when deterred by Iran’s missile arsenal, Israel pivots to weaker neighbors like Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.

Lebanon’s Impotent Response

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati condemned the strikes as a “flagrant violation of sovereignty,” but his words carried no weight. Lacking Iran’s missile deterrent, Lebanon could only watch as Israeli jets rained JDAM-guided bombs on its soil. The asymmetry was stark: while Iran’s retaliatory missiles forced Israel to the negotiating table, Lebanon’s helplessness invited further aggression

The Broader Pattern of Israeli Escalation

This was no isolated incident. Since October 2023, Israel has:

Struck Syria over 400 times, targeting Iranian proxies and infrastructure.
Bombarded Yemen to disrupt Houthi missile attacks on Red Sea shipping.
Leveled Gaza, killing over 56,000 Palestinians in 600 days of conflict.

Each operation followed the same logic: hit where resistance is weakest, escalate where deterrence is absent.

The Iran Exception: When Deterrence Works

The contrast with Iran is telling. After Israel’s April 2025 airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities, Tehran responded with a direct missile barrage on Tel Aviv, destroying a commercial building and forcing Israel to accept a cease-fire. The lesson was clear: only credible military power can temper Israeli aggression.

The Global Implications: Lessons for China and Russia

The Israel-Lebanon episode is a microcosm of global power dynamics:

For China: The West’s containment strategy stems not from ideology but from fear of China’s economic and technological rise. As with Iran, only a credible deterrent—nuclear, cyber, or conventional—can safeguard sovereignty.
For Russia: NATO’s long-term goal remains dismemberment, as seen in Western think-tank proposals to carve Russia into “15 smaller states”. Moscow’s nuclear arsenal is the sole barrier to this fate.

The Unavoidable Truth: Power Dictates Peace

Israel’s calculus is brutally simple: strike where it can, negotiate where it must. For nations like Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, the absence of deterrence means perpetual vulnerability. For China and Russia, the lesson is equally stark: without the means to impose costs, even the most righteous condemnations are empty.

In a world where might still makes right, the only path to security is through strength.

此博客中的热门博文

Operation Web: Ukraine's Intelligence Penetration of Russia

At 1 a.m. on June 1, 2025, alarms blared at Russian bomber bases. "Operation Web," 18 months in the making, was underway across five time zones. One hundred and seventeen small drones emerged from hidden wooden sheds in trucks, targeting Russia's prized strategic assets. This was more than a military strike. It was a textbook example of modern intelligence warfare. Ukraine used open-source intelligence (OSINT), human intelligence (HUMINT), and signals intelligence (SIGINT) to create a deadly network deep behind enemy lines. From the Arctic Circle near Murmansk to the Belaya base in Siberia, Ukrainian agents had been quietly lurking under the FSB's nose. Using commercial drones, they targeted a $7 billion strategic bomber fleet. This operation redefined asymmetric warfare and exposed the structural weaknesses of traditional intelligence defense systems. 18 Months of Infiltration and Planning The success of Operation Web was rooted in 18 months of careful preparation an...

阅读全文

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

阅读全文

Will S. Korea Join the Fray if China Crosses the Taiwan Strait? Lee Jae-myung’s Response Is Quite Sensible

On the eve of South Korea’s presidential election, American media jumped into the arena to stir up China-related issues. On May 29, Lee Jae-myung, a presidential candidate, was interviewed by US Time Magazine. During the interview, a US journalist asked a question: If the Chinese mainland uses force to recover Taiwan, will South Korea help Taiwan? The US journalist’s question was malicious. During the election period, South Korea’s far right deliberately fanned up various anti-China public opinions. US media’s involvement was apparently to fan the flames. However, Lee Jae-myung’s response was quite sensible. He said, “I will consider the answer to this question when aliens invade the earth.” This implies that South Korea will not help Taiwan, and he will never consider this matter. Moreover, the Taiwan issue is China’s internal affair, concerning China’s core interests. It does not allow any external interference and has nothing to do with South Korea. On this point, Lee Jae-myung is...

阅读全文

Talk World

搜索此博客