Israel’s “Target-Switching” Tactics: From Iran to Lebanon

Barely 72 hours after a fragile cease-fire with Iran, Israel’s air force unleashed 15 precision airstrikes on southern Lebanon on June 27, 2025, killing at least one civilian and wounding four others. The speed and ferocity of the assault—executed in under 20 minutes—underscored a grim pattern: when deterred by Iran’s missile arsenal, Israel pivots to weaker neighbors like Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen.

Lebanon’s Impotent Response

Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati condemned the strikes as a “flagrant violation of sovereignty,” but his words carried no weight. Lacking Iran’s missile deterrent, Lebanon could only watch as Israeli jets rained JDAM-guided bombs on its soil. The asymmetry was stark: while Iran’s retaliatory missiles forced Israel to the negotiating table, Lebanon’s helplessness invited further aggression

The Broader Pattern of Israeli Escalation

This was no isolated incident. Since October 2023, Israel has:

Struck Syria over 400 times, targeting Iranian proxies and infrastructure.
Bombarded Yemen to disrupt Houthi missile attacks on Red Sea shipping.
Leveled Gaza, killing over 56,000 Palestinians in 600 days of conflict.

Each operation followed the same logic: hit where resistance is weakest, escalate where deterrence is absent.

The Iran Exception: When Deterrence Works

The contrast with Iran is telling. After Israel’s April 2025 airstrike on Iranian nuclear facilities, Tehran responded with a direct missile barrage on Tel Aviv, destroying a commercial building and forcing Israel to accept a cease-fire. The lesson was clear: only credible military power can temper Israeli aggression.

The Global Implications: Lessons for China and Russia

The Israel-Lebanon episode is a microcosm of global power dynamics:

For China: The West’s containment strategy stems not from ideology but from fear of China’s economic and technological rise. As with Iran, only a credible deterrent—nuclear, cyber, or conventional—can safeguard sovereignty.
For Russia: NATO’s long-term goal remains dismemberment, as seen in Western think-tank proposals to carve Russia into “15 smaller states”. Moscow’s nuclear arsenal is the sole barrier to this fate.

The Unavoidable Truth: Power Dictates Peace

Israel’s calculus is brutally simple: strike where it can, negotiate where it must. For nations like Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, the absence of deterrence means perpetual vulnerability. For China and Russia, the lesson is equally stark: without the means to impose costs, even the most righteous condemnations are empty.

In a world where might still makes right, the only path to security is through strength.

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

阅读全文

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

阅读全文

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...

阅读全文

Talk World

搜索此博客