跳至主要内容

Coming Tomorrow: A New Four-Part Series

 


A few weeks ago I wrapped up a quartet on how the world’s shipbuilding crown passed from one nation to another after World War II. Readers wrote in asking for something similar—an inside look at how a single industry evolves when the headlines go quiet. I’ve spent the last month digging through archives and interview transcripts, and tomorrow I’ll begin a new four-part series on soybeans.

Don’t yawn. Soy looks dull only until you notice that every cargo of beans is also a cargo of leverage: food security, trade wars, genetically-modified seed patents, dollar diplomacy, and the contest for who sets the global rules on climate and labor. In other words, the fights are every bit as fierce as the ones that once sent riveters swarming over steel hulls in Glasgow, Nagasaki, or Ulsan.
Below are the four shipbuilding pieces that started the conversation. Each one stands alone, but read in order they tell one continuous story of industrial rise, fall, and revenge.
––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
  1. The Empire That Out-built Itself
    How the United States exploded from zero to the world’s largest shipyard in 1942—then watched its yards empty almost overnight. The hidden culprit: Washington’s own victory dividend.
  2. Sugar-coated Torpedo: Tokyo’s 1950s Power Play
    Why the British thought they had the post-war shipping market locked up—until Japanese trading houses used surplus sugar profits to bankroll cut-price hulls and steal London’s crown.
  3. The Apprentice Who Outran Both Masters
    Seoul, 1969: no deep-water tradition, no steel, no capital. Yet within twenty years Korean yards were launching more tonnage than anyone else. The secret weapon: a still-bitter Britain willing to license every blueprint it had.
  4. Return of the Original King
    For thirteen centuries the biggest wooden fleets on the planet flew the dragon flag of China. After a hundred-year hiatus, the Middle Kingdom is once again launching more ships than the rest of the world combined—this time with robots, state credit, and a quiet plan to write the next maritime order.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...