跳至主要内容

Kim Jong-un Steps onto the World Stage—Beijing’s Guest List Leaves Seoul Uneasy

 When China released the roster of foreign leaders coming to its 3 September military parade, one name jumped out: Kim Jong-un. Not a single leak had hinted he would appear, and until that moment most analysts assumed Pyongyang’s leader would stay home. Whether Beijing and Pyongyang had quietly sealed the invitation months ago or hammered it out at the last minute is less important than the signal the appearance itself sends.

Of the 26 heads of state attending, Kim is listed second, right after Russia’s Vladimir Putin. The Chinese protocol office insists every guest is treated with equal courtesy, yet in diplomacy the order on a seating chart is never accidental. By placing Kim so close to the top, Beijing is stating—quietly but unmistably—how it still regards the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea: a traditional neighbor “linked by mountains and rivers,” in the Foreign Ministry’s own phrase, whose friendship China is determined to “safeguard, consolidate and develop.”

Western commentary has spent the past year arguing that Russia’s war in Ukraine and the deepening Moscow-Pyongyang embrace were pushing Kim away from Beijing. The guest list demolishes that narrative at a stroke. No one is watching more nervously than South Korea. Within minutes of the announcement, Seoul’s major newspapers and TV networks pivoted to the story, dissecting its every nuance.
For South Korean analysts, the headline is that this will be Kim’s debut on a multilateral stage. Until now his foreign appearances have been strictly bilateral or trilateral—the 2019 DMZ handshake with Donald Trump and Moon Jae-in being the most memorable. Some pundits in Seoul claim Pyongyang avoids larger gatherings for fear they might dilute the leader’s carefully cultivated aura of singular authority. Yet that explanation says more about their own preconceptions than about North Korean reasoning. The simpler truth is that Pyongyang has been diplomatically boxed in: invitations were scarce, security concerns acute, and many capitals wary of angering Washington.
Beijing’s parade therefore offers Kim something rare: a safe venue packed with presidents, prime ministers and heads of international organizations, all under one roof. The potential pay-off is enormous. North Korea’s economic woes owe much to its isolation; a single weekend in Beijing could open channels that sanctions and propaganda have long kept sealed. Even if no breakthrough follows, the mere fact that Kim can mingle with twenty-plus world leaders chips away at the caricature of an irredeemably hermit kingdom.
Recent events already hinted at a tentative opening. Reports that North Korean troops have been deployed to Russia’s Kursk region—framed in Pyongyang as routine alliance duties—simultaneously advertise the DPRK’s willingness to act far beyond the Korean Peninsula. Moscow, for its part, has become Pyongyang’s loudest advocate at the U.N. Security Council. Beijing’s parade gives Kim a second window to the world, this time with a broader guest list.
Some observers in Seoul even speculate that Kim’s appearance could revive direct talks with Washington. Donald Trump, newly returned to the campaign trail, recently told South Korean President Lee Jae-myung that he still hopes for another face-to-face with Kim. Pyongyang’s rhetoric remains scathing, but every public outing builds the young leader’s confidence. If the choreography in Beijing feels safe and successful, the leap to a Trump-Kim encore may look less daunting.
Western pundits often lump Beijing, Moscow and Pyongyang into a new “axis,” yet the reality is more nuanced. China’s partnership with Russia is at a historic high; Russia’s with North Korea is deepening; China’s with North Korea has been quieter—until now. Kim’s presence on the Tiananmen rostrum is Pyongyang’s way of saying the conversation with Beijing never really stopped. All three governments share overlapping security interests, even if they balk at anything resembling an old-style military bloc.
In short, Beijing’s guest list is more than ceremonial; it is strategic. Over the next few days cameras will track Kim Jong-un’s every handshake, smile and salute. The world will be watching—but no one will be watching more closely, or with tighter stomachs, than South Korea.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...