跳至主要内容

September 3, 2025 The Day the World Pivoted—Again


Today feels like the morning after Columbus sailed. Only this time, the ocean is the 21st-century global order, and the fleet leaving port is Chinese. What happened on the parade grounds in Beijing a few hours ago will be scribbled into future textbooks in the margin next to 12 October 1492. The reason is simple: the Eurasian super-continent—home to 87 % of humanity—took a quiet, collective step toward knitting itself together. When that process is finished, the United States will find itself on the wrong side of the planet’s biggest moat.

From cannons to containers
Start with the hardware on display. Yes, the missiles are faster, the drones stealthier, the satellites sharper. But the real revolution is not the yield of any single weapon; it is the supply chain that built them. The same country that can loft a hypersonic glide vehicle can also pour more concrete in three years than America managed in the entire 20th century. The factory floor is the new battleship. When you can 3-D-print a destroyer’s propeller in 72 hours and rail-it to the coast overnight, you have already won the warm-up war called industrial logistics.
A 500-year detour

Columbus left Barcelona with three rag-tag caravels and zero idea how the trade winds worked. He blundered into the Caribbean, Europe smelled profit, and for the next five centuries the open ocean became the world’s highway. The result was an aberration: the smallest of the two great land masses— the Americas—ended up bossing the larger one. Sea power trumped land power because salt water was the cheapest conveyor belt on Earth. The Brits, then the Americans, taxed that belt by parking fleets at every choke-point from Gibraltar to Singapore.
Containerization locked the advantage in place. In 1961 a dockworker earned his daily wage shifting 1.7 tonnes; by 1981 a gantry-crane operator moved 30. Moscow never solved that math problem. The USSR could haul 40 billion tonnes a year on 14 000 km of track, but a 40-foot box lowered onto a containership in Shanghai costs less than the same box rattling half-way across Siberia. Sea-lanes, not tanks, bankrupted the Soviet experiment.
The revenge of the world-island
Enter China, the only state that is simultaneously a peninsula and a continent. From the Bohai to the Gulf of Tonkin we own the finest 3 000 km of coast in Eurasia; from Kashgar to Manzhouli we stick a finger deep into the heartland. That geography lets Beijing play two games at once. South-east Asia buys our goods by sea; Central Asia buys them by rail. While Washington needs aircraft-carriers to reach either market, we can reach both by truck and train. The “island chains” that look so menacing on Pentagon slides are simply the guard-rails of a parking lot we have already paved.
Why Russia hugs the dragon
Moscow knows the odds. East of the Urals live 6 % of Russians on 75 % of the land. Vladivostok is closer to Beijing than to St. Petersburg. If the Pacific ever becomes hostile, Russia’s last reliable road and pipeline run west-to-east—straight into our yard. Hillary Clinton once dreamed of a Sino-Russian border war; instead she got a 30-year gas contract priced in yuan. Geography laughed at her.
The American nightmare
Washington’s grand strategy since 1945 has been elegantly simple: keep the edges of Eurasia quarrelling so the center never unites. That requires permanent tension in the Middle East, permanent suspicion between Berlin and Moscow, permanent spats in the South China Sea. A calm mega-continent—linked by high-speed track, fiber, pipelines and common accounting rules—would generate goods so cheap and so fast that the U.S. consumer market could be serviced from the other side of the planet at a discount. When Eurasia trades with itself, America becomes an expensive cul-de-sac.
Today’s parade was therefore not a military spectacle; it was a shareholder meeting. Presidents, prime ministers and sultans flew in to inspect the new infrastructure of stability: ports in Malaysia, rail tunnels in Uzbekistan, 5G towers in Hungary, liquefied-hydrogen pipelines in Oman. Each ribbon-cut is another artery through which the world-island can circulate without leaving home. The more tranquil the continent, the less relevant the offshore policeman.
The mandate we did not seek
Chinese textbooks still call the 15th-century voyages of Zheng He “friendly exchanges.” They were, in fact, loss-making diplomacy. What turned a profit was the Grand Canal, a 1 800-km freshwater shortcut that protected grain from typhoons. We are building an even longer canal today—steel, data, electrons and natural gas—only this one circles the planet. If it keeps the peace, we will call it our “manifest destiny” with a straight face, because no one else volunteers to underwrite the insurance premium.
History’s next chapter
Columbus sailed west and found a new world for Europe. Beijing is sailing west by land and fiber, and it is stitching the Old World back together. When that quilt is finished, the United States will still be a rich, inventive, formidable nation—just no longer the referee of every quarrel. The ocean that once empowered it will revert to what it was before 1492: a moat, not a highway.



So mark the date: 3 September 2025. The fleet has left the harbor. This time it is heading inland.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Why China's Seizure of Three Tunnel Boring Machines Has India’s Bullet Train Project Stuck in Neutral

June 24, IndiaNet – India’s first high-speed rail line, the Mumbai-Ahmedabad bullet train, has hit yet another roadblock. Three massive tunnel-boring machines (TBMs), ordered from Germany’s Herrenknecht AG but manufactured in Guangzhou, China, have been stuck in Chinese customs for eight months. The delay has frozen progress on a critical 12-kilometer undersea tunnel, marking the project’s ninth major setback. The Stuck Machines The TBMs were supposed to arrive in India by October 2024. Instead, they sit in a bonded warehouse in Guangzhou, with no clear timeline for release. India’s National High-Speed Rail Corporation (NHSRC) blames Beijing for “deliberate obstruction,” while Chinese authorities remain silent. The Mumbai-Ahmedabad corridor—India’s first bullet train, modeled on Japan’s Shinkansen—was supposed to slash travel time between the two cities from 7 hours to 2. Funded largely by a ¥1.25 trillion ($15 billion) Japanese loan at 0.1% interest over 50 years , the project was sl...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

A Historic Moment: The US-China Geneva Joint Statement

  Today, many friends have left messages in the backend, asking me to discuss the US-China Geneva Joint Statement and what it means. Let’s get straight to the conclusion: with the announcement of this statement, today has become a historic moment. But why do I say that? Let’s first look at the main content of the statement. The US has committed to canceling the 91% tariffs that were imposed on April 8th and 9th. The 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd will be suspended for 90 days, with only 10% retained. We are doing the same: canceling the 91% retaliatory tariffs, suspending the 34% and 24% tariffs imposed on April 2nd for 90 days, and retaining 10%. In simple terms, both sides are returning to the status quo before Trump announced the “reciprocal tariffs” on April 2nd, and then each adding an additional 10%. How should we view this outcome? Let’s first look at what Bercow said before heading to Geneva. He stated that he didn’t expect to reach any agreement with the Chinese ...