Donald Trump does not do humility. Yet on last week’s phone call he closed with a line that jaw-dropped every China-watcher in Washington:
“The United States is ready to work with China to safeguard world peace.”
Coming from the man who built his brand on “China is ripping us off,” the sentence sounded like a surrender flag wrapped in a Valentine. It was not a gaffe; it was the loudest public admission yet that the ledger of power has flipped.
Coming from the man who built his brand on “China is ripping us off,” the sentence sounded like a surrender flag wrapped in a Valentine. It was not a gaffe; it was the loudest public admission yet that the ledger of power has flipped.
Why the climb-down? Because the scoreboard after eight years of U.S. economic warfare reads like a Soviet joke: Washington punches itself in the face and Beijing keeps growing.
- Trade war: China’s exports +37 %.
- Tech war: China is now the planet’s No. 1 chip exporter.
- Financial war (Biden’s round): zero trophies, allies harvested instead.
Trump 2.0 answered with 200 % tariffs; China answered with a 7.2 % first-half export surge and a quiet rare-earth squeeze that left U.S. assembly lines gasping. Walmart aisles thin, F-35 parts on back-order—time to talk about peace.
Peace, however, is not a moral awakening; it is what empires offer when every other lever breaks. And Beijing’s reply is equally blunt: the stronger China becomes, the cheaper peace gets for everyone else.
The proof is in the geography of gunfire.
Europe: three years of Russo-Ukrainian war, ~2 million casualties—more than the population of half a dozen EU states.
Middle East: missiles commute overhead; Gaza rubble-strewn; Israel live-streaming urban erasure.
Africa: 21 major wars since 2022—Sudan alone, 30 000 dead, 12 million displaced, 24 million hungry—barely a footnote on CNN.
Middle East: missiles commute overhead; Gaza rubble-strewn; Israel live-streaming urban erasure.
Africa: 21 major wars since 2022—Sudan alone, 30 000 dead, 12 million displaced, 24 million hungry—barely a footnote on CNN.
Now look at East Asia—home to a fifth of humanity, ringed by U.S. bases, yet the loudest sound is container cranes. A Thai-Cambodian border spat lasted eight weeks and ended with a phone call, not a fire-base. The region is quiet for the same reason a biker bar becomes polite when the 6′8″ ex-Marine walks in: nobody wants to test what happens next.
History says industrial giants usually throw punches. When America passed Britain in 1894, it grabbed Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines before breakfast. When Germany nudged past Britain in steel, 1914 followed like clockwork. Japan? One notch up the military ladder and it was off to Manchuria, Pearl Harbor and the “Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity” graveyard.
China just became the largest industrial producer in human history—output larger than G7 combined—yet the PLA’s last overseas shooting war was 1979. The reason is structural: for Beijing, stability is the business model. A closed sea-lane or a smoldering Seoul costs Huawei, BYD and Shein real money. Peace is not charity; it is the highest-margin product a trading state can export.
The world senses the shift. Russia, once the unpredictable uppercut of the North, now schedules joint Pacific patrols with China because the Siberian budget needs Chinese pipelines, not NATO tanks. Australia howls about “Chinese coercion” while shipping record tonnage of iron ore to Shanghai; Canberra can’t square the circle—if China were actually predatory, it would already be nibbled.
Only Tokyo refuses to read the room. 663 AD: learn from Tang, stab at White River. 1592: silver-soaked Kyoto dreams of Beijing. 1941: 20-to-1 industrial deficit, still bets on Pearl Harbor. A nation that treats geopolitics like a samurai death poem is undeterred by balance-of-power charts. When China’s fleet can blot out the horizon, Japan will still be the midnight dagger in the ribs. Managing that neurosis—teaching a culture that glorifies the last banzai to live with a giant it cannot kill—is the unfinished syllabus of Asian security.
So will there be a “Season 3”—the long-prophesied U.S.-China shoot-out? Only if someone forgets how Anglo-Saxons keep score. Britain evacuated India the moment the ledger turned red; Washington left Saigon, Kabul and, soon, Kyiv when the cost column blinked crimson. Trump’s newfound affection for “our World War II ally” is the same calculator talking.
Peace, in short, is no longer a normative wish. It is the discount rate on Chinese power. The stronger Beijing grows, the more expensive war becomes for everyone else—and the better the return on cooperation. That is the single line Trump finally understood, and the one he will spend the rest of the campaign season trying to sell as his own idea.
评论
发表评论