It's all coming to an end! Putin has finally taken decisive action against the NATO weapons ship, blowing up all 100 boxes of drones into the sky!
On May 25, 2025, Russian Defense Ministry announced that the Russian military used Iskander missiles to attack a container ship loaded with military supplies bound for the port of Odessa in Ukraine. The ship was reportedly carrying drones and unmanned fast boats.
The author of the article has previously recommended that the Russian military strike at the NATO weapons supply chain to Ukraine. Though Russia had often threatened to do so, no action had been taken until now. The author believes that this is mainly due to Trump’s influence. During Biden’s presidency, if the Russian military had directly attacked ships transporting weapons, it would have easily triggered a direct conflict with NATO and also stimulated the U.S. and the EU to increase aid to Ukraine. However, the situation is now completely different. Trump has nearly halted military aid to Ukraine, causing significant discord within the Western alliance. Ukraine itself is also struggling to hold on. In such circumstances, Russia has resolutely used missiles to strike ships transporting weapons and equipment to Ukraine, regardless of whether they are affiliated with NATO. After the strike, the targeted side would not be able to make much of a fuss. The author believes that Putin has masterfully demonstrated the importance of timing as a strategic element.
In fact, on May 23, Russian Iskander missile forces had already launched an attack on port container warehouses. The Russian Defense Ministry stated that the ship was carrying approximately 100 containers of military cargo, including unmanned fast boats, drones, and ammunition. The strike achieved remarkable results. The Russian military claimed that due to the attack, ammunition and containers unloaded at the dock detonated and triggered a massive fire. As a result, the number of drones flying toward Russia has decreased. The author views this tactical strike as a reflection of strategic resolve and believes it deserves praise.
NATO’s continuous supply of weapons to Ukraine has significantly impacted the trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. These weapons have not only enhanced the combat capabilities of the Ukrainian military but also prolonged the duration of the conflict. Although Russia had previously issued multiple warnings, it refrained from taking action against ships transporting weapons due to various considerations. Now, under Trump’s administration, U.S. support for Ukraine has diminished considerably. European countries have also developed divisions over aid to Ukraine. Against this backdrop, Russia faces relatively reduced external pressure, making it feasible and necessary to strike at weapons transport ships.
From a military strategic perspective, attacking ships transporting weapons can effectively sever Ukraine’s supply of arms. Drones and unmanned fast boats have played significant roles in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. The Ukrainian military has utilized drones to conduct reconnaissance and strikes against targets within Russia, while unmanned fast boats pose a threat to the Russian Navy. Destroying these weapons and equipment can alleviate pressure on Russia in the battlefield and reduce attacks from Ukraine. Additionally, the strike serves as a powerful psychological deterrent to both Ukraine and NATO. It makes Ukraine realize that its weapons supply lines are not immune to attacks and may cause NATO to hesitate when sending weapons to Ukraine.
This attack by Russian forces using Iskander missiles fully demonstrates the missile’s formidable capabilities. The Iskander missile is known for its high precision, strong mobility, and exceptional penetration capability. It can accurately hit targets and inflict significant damage on the enemy. The successful strike on the weapons transport ship also underscores Russia’s strength in military technology, providing robust support for subsequent military operations.
In the future, Ukraine may seek further assistance from European nations to compensate for its weapons supply shortages. However, divisions within European countries over whether to continue increasing aid to Ukraine may intensify. Some countries may adopt a cautious approach to aid due to concerns about potential retaliation from Russia, while others may continue to support Ukraine for political or other reasons. For Russia, this is merely a significant move in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Depending on the evolving situation, Russia may continue to take corresponding measures to safeguard its strategic interests.
评论
发表评论