跳至主要内容

The Bizarre Hat-Throwing Game in Washington (A political-economic analysis for American readers)


Two men are playing a dangerous game of "hat-throwing" in Washington—and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Act I: The Trump-Powell Showdown

Last week, former President Donald Trump lobbed the first insult: Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is a "stupid person" and a "stubborn mule" who should resign. Trump’s message was crude but clear: You’re wrecking the economy, and I’ll replace you.
Powell’s response? Silence. Not even a polite "no comment." Just… nothing. Like a judo master letting an opponent’s punch sail past, Powell’s inaction left Trump swinging at air.
Enraged, Trump escalated. On June 30, he posted a handwritten note to Powell on Truth Social:
"Jerome, you’re always ‘too late.’ You’re costing America billions. Cut rates NOW."
Attached: A global interest-rate chart showing the U.S. paying more than almost anyone else.

Then came the chorus:
  • White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt flashed the note at reporters.
  • National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett declared the Fed "has no excuse" to keep rates high.
  • Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called the Fed’s 2023 inflation response a "giant mistake."
  • Trump’s congressional allies threatened to subpoena Powell.
The message: This economic mess is YOUR fault, Jerome.


Act II: Powell Strikes Back

At the European Central Bank’s forum in Sintra, Portugal, Powell finally spoke—but not to apologize.
"We paused rate cuts because tariffs create inflation uncertainty," he said, barely masking his target. Translation: You started the trade war, Donald. Don’t blame me for the fallout.
A planted question from a reporter gave Powell the perfect opening:
"If not for tariffs, would you have cut rates?"
"Yes," Powell replied bluntly. "Tariffs have made inflation timing, magnitude, and persistence impossible to predict."
Powell wasn’t just defending the Fed. He was returning the hat—hard.


Act III: The Real Storm Behind the Drama

Why this sudden mudslinging? Because both men know the truth: America’s economic foundations are cracking.
  • Q1 GDP contracted 0.5%—worse than expected.
  • The dollar has lost 10% of its value this year, with the euro hitting a four-year high.
  • Domestic consumption is collapsing: goods down 2.8%, services down 0.3%.
Trump sees the writing on the wall: If the economy implodes on his watch, no amount of Biden-bashing will save him. Powell, meanwhile, knows the Fed will be the scapegoat if recession hits.
This isn’t about policy independence. It’s about survival.

Epilogue: The Gathering Storm

The hat-throwing isn’t childish—it’s strategic. Both men are bracing for impact, each trying to pin the blame before the storm breaks.
For Americans, the takeaway is clear:
  1. Crisis = Danger + Opportunity. The coming turbulence will create winners and losers.
  2. Global contagion is real. When the world’s largest economy stumbles, no one escapes.
Buckle up. The game is just beginning.

评论

此博客中的热门博文

Operation Web: Ukraine's Intelligence Penetration of Russia

At 1 a.m. on June 1, 2025, alarms blared at Russian bomber bases. "Operation Web," 18 months in the making, was underway across five time zones. One hundred and seventeen small drones emerged from hidden wooden sheds in trucks, targeting Russia's prized strategic assets. This was more than a military strike. It was a textbook example of modern intelligence warfare. Ukraine used open-source intelligence (OSINT), human intelligence (HUMINT), and signals intelligence (SIGINT) to create a deadly network deep behind enemy lines. From the Arctic Circle near Murmansk to the Belaya base in Siberia, Ukrainian agents had been quietly lurking under the FSB's nose. Using commercial drones, they targeted a $7 billion strategic bomber fleet. This operation redefined asymmetric warfare and exposed the structural weaknesses of traditional intelligence defense systems. 18 Months of Infiltration and Planning The success of Operation Web was rooted in 18 months of careful preparation an...

Open-Source Intelligence Analysis of the 2025 India-Pakistan Military Standoff

  In the recent India-Pakistan standoff, open-source intelligence (OSINT) channels have played an extremely important role in information dissemination and intelligence analysis. Various open-source platforms, including social media, commercial satellite imagery, vessel and aviation tracking data, news reports, and military forums, have collectively formed a "second front" for battlefield situational awareness, helping all parties to promptly understand and verify the dynamics of the conflict. However, the reliability of different OSINT channels varies, and it is necessary to cross-reference them to obtain the most accurate intelligence possible. Below is an analysis of the main channels: Social Media (Twitter/X, Facebook, etc.) Social media platforms are among the fastest sources for disseminating information about the conflict. A large number of first-hand witnesses, journalists, and even soldiers post photos, videos, and written reports through social media. For example, r...

Will S. Korea Join the Fray if China Crosses the Taiwan Strait? Lee Jae-myung’s Response Is Quite Sensible

On the eve of South Korea’s presidential election, American media jumped into the arena to stir up China-related issues. On May 29, Lee Jae-myung, a presidential candidate, was interviewed by US Time Magazine. During the interview, a US journalist asked a question: If the Chinese mainland uses force to recover Taiwan, will South Korea help Taiwan? The US journalist’s question was malicious. During the election period, South Korea’s far right deliberately fanned up various anti-China public opinions. US media’s involvement was apparently to fan the flames. However, Lee Jae-myung’s response was quite sensible. He said, “I will consider the answer to this question when aliens invade the earth.” This implies that South Korea will not help Taiwan, and he will never consider this matter. Moreover, the Taiwan issue is China’s internal affair, concerning China’s core interests. It does not allow any external interference and has nothing to do with South Korea. On this point, Lee Jae-myung is...